question 1: I think it's use a difference between the personalities of the people. People deal with grief differently so it's to be expected that families had different reactions to the fate of their family members.
question 2: I don't think it's important we know who it is especially since there were countless others who jumped or fell from the building as well. Either way that person is gone and how they died doesn't seem like a huge difference
question 3: I don't think showing the photo is exploitation if it were every single person who photographed tragedy would be exploiting instead of sharing. Because the world now a days everyone is connected and this is a way of putting a common face to the tragedy.
question 4: that it doesn't really matter ho he is , people should be deciding how that photograph impacts them rather than who that person is. because one person identified doesn't make a difference and the whole reason that photo was published was to make an impact
question 5: I'm not really sure that doesn't really resonate with me much. but it does seem fitting because people were basically entombed and unknown
question 6: that seems incredibly true . you have no idea what these people really felt or went through but these pictures give us a window and we should at least have some understanding of the things that happened to them because they don't deserve those burdens and if we maybe have an idea of what happened people won't be impassive. they'll care more and be more aware.
No comments:
Post a Comment